File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102275
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85177547715
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade
Title | Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Artificial intelligence (AI) Classroom discourse Systematic review Technology |
Issue Date | 1-Jan-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | International Journal of Educational Research, 2024, v. 123 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Over the past decade, multiple artificial intelligence-based models and systems have been developed and employed in classroom discourse as a means of facilitating learning and teaching. To provide valuable guidance for future studies seeking to effectively integrate powerful artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on artificial intelligence in classroom discourse (AICD) over the past decade. Following the latest PRISMA framework, we searched the Web of Science database and the relevant conference proceedings and identified a total of 68 studies. Five themes across the studies were examined: basic sample statistics, educational contexts, data sources, AI technologies, and the effects of AICD. The findings revealed that most AICD studies focused on science-related and language-related at the primary and secondary school levels. Various AI models and systems were developed and used to analyze student-related interaction and learning (e.g., speech acts and collaboration), teacher-related instructional behavior (e.g., question-asking and uptake), and whole-class dialogue (e.g., topic evolution) based on their discourse data in both online and offline classroom settings. Furthermore, the use of AI in classroom discourse was found to be impactful on learning gains, emotions (e.g., willingness and affordance), behavior (e.g., teachers’ uptake and students’ conversation), and perception of AI. We further discussed the future directions of the field, such as the increasing popularity of deep learning models (e.g., ChatGPT) in investigations of classroom discourse and the urgent need to evaluate the effect of AICD in practice. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345893 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.060 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Deliang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tao, Yang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Gaowei | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-04T07:06:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-04T07:06:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Educational Research, 2024, v. 123 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0883-0355 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345893 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Over the past decade, multiple artificial intelligence-based models and systems have been developed and employed in classroom discourse as a means of facilitating learning and teaching. To provide valuable guidance for future studies seeking to effectively integrate powerful artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on artificial intelligence in classroom discourse (AICD) over the past decade. Following the latest PRISMA framework, we searched the Web of Science database and the relevant conference proceedings and identified a total of 68 studies. Five themes across the studies were examined: basic sample statistics, educational contexts, data sources, AI technologies, and the effects of AICD. The findings revealed that most AICD studies focused on science-related and language-related at the primary and secondary school levels. Various AI models and systems were developed and used to analyze student-related interaction and learning (e.g., speech acts and collaboration), teacher-related instructional behavior (e.g., question-asking and uptake), and whole-class dialogue (e.g., topic evolution) based on their discourse data in both online and offline classroom settings. Furthermore, the use of AI in classroom discourse was found to be impactful on learning gains, emotions (e.g., willingness and affordance), behavior (e.g., teachers’ uptake and students’ conversation), and perception of AI. We further discussed the future directions of the field, such as the increasing popularity of deep learning models (e.g., ChatGPT) in investigations of classroom discourse and the urgent need to evaluate the effect of AICD in practice.<br></p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Educational Research | - |
dc.subject | Artificial intelligence (AI) | - |
dc.subject | Classroom discourse | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject | Technology | - |
dc.title | Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102275 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85177547715 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 123 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-538X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0883-0355 | - |