File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Key lifestyles and health outcomes across 16 prevalent chronic diseases: A network analysis of an international observational study

TitleKey lifestyles and health outcomes across 16 prevalent chronic diseases: A network analysis of an international observational study
Authors
Issue Date12-Apr-2024
PublisherInternational Society of Global Health
Citation
Journal of Global Health, 2024, v. 14 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background Central and bridge nodes can drive significant overall improvements within their respective networks. We aimed to identify them in 16 prevalent chronic diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to guide effective intervention strategies and appropriate resource allocation for most significant holistic lifestyle and health improvements. Methods We surveyed 16512 adults from July 2020 to August 2021 in 30 territories. Participants self-reported their medical histories and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on 18 lifestyle factors and 13 health outcomes. For each disease subgroup, we generated lifestyle, health outcome, and bridge networks. Variables with the highest centrality indices in each were identified central or bridge. We validated these networks using nonparametric and case-dropping subset bootstrapping and confirmed central and bridge variables’ significantly higher indices through a centrality difference test. Findings Among the 48 networks, 44 were validated (all correlation-stability coefficients?>0.25). Six central lifestyle factors were identified: less consumption of snacks (for the chronic disease: anxiety), less sugary drinks (cancer, gastric ulcer, hypertension, insomnia, and pre-diabetes), less smoking tobacco (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), frequency of exercise (depression and fatty liver disease), duration of exercise (irritable bowel syndrome), and overall amount of exercise (autoimmune disease, diabetes, eczema, heart attack, and high cholesterol). Two central health outcomes emerged: less emotional distress (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, eczema, fatty liver disease, gastric ulcer, heart attack, high cholesterol, hypertension, insomnia, and pre-diabetes) and quality of life (anxiety, autoimmune disease, cancer, depression, diabetes, and irritable bowel syndrome). Four bridge lifestyles were identified: consumption of fruits and vegetables (diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and insomnia), less duration of sitting (eczema, fatty liver disease, and heart attack), frequency of exercise (autoimmune disease, depression, and heart attack), and overall amount of exercise (anxiety, gastric ulcer, and insomnia). The centrality difference test showed the central and bridge variables had significantly higher centrality indices than others in their networks (P<0.05). Conclusion To effectively manage chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic, enhanced interventions and optimised resource allocation toward central lifestyle factors, health outcomes, and bridge lifestyles are paramount. The key variables shared across chronic diseases emphasise the importance of coordinated intervention strategies. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347378
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.093

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, JY-
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYT-
dc.contributor.authorLok, KYW-
dc.contributor.authorWong, JYH-
dc.contributor.authorHo, MM-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, EPH-
dc.contributor.authorPandian, V-
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, PM-
dc.contributor.authorDuan, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorTarrant, M-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorLin, CC-
dc.contributor.authorAkingbade, O-
dc.contributor.authorAlabdulwahhab, KM-
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, MS-
dc.contributor.authorAlboraie, M-
dc.contributor.authorAlzahrani, MA-
dc.contributor.authorBilimale, AS-
dc.contributor.authorBoonpatcharanon, S-
dc.contributor.authorByiringiro, S-
dc.contributor.authorHasan, MKC-
dc.contributor.authorSchettini, LC-
dc.contributor.authorCorzo, W-
dc.contributor.authorDe Leon, JM-
dc.contributor.authorDe Leon, AS-
dc.contributor.authorDeek, H-
dc.contributor.authorEfficace, F-
dc.contributor.authorEl Nayal, MA-
dc.contributor.authorEl-Raey, F-
dc.contributor.authorEnsaldo-Carrasco, E-
dc.contributor.authorEscotorin, P-
dc.contributor.authorFadodun, OA-
dc.contributor.authorFawole, IO-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, YSS-
dc.contributor.authorIrawan, D-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, NE-
dc.contributor.authorKoirala, B-
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, A-
dc.contributor.authorKwok, C-
dc.contributor.authorLe, TT-
dc.contributor.authorLeal, DG-
dc.contributor.authorLezana-Fernández, MA-
dc.contributor.authorManirambona, E-
dc.contributor.authorMantoani, LC-
dc.contributor.authorMeneses-González, F-
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, IE-
dc.contributor.authorMukeshimana, M-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, CTM-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, HTT-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, KT-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, ST-
dc.contributor.authorNurumal, MS-
dc.contributor.authorNzabonimana, A-
dc.contributor.authorOmer, NAMA-
dc.contributor.authorOgungbe, O-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorReséndiz-Rodríguez, A-
dc.contributor.authorPuang-Ngern, B-
dc.contributor.authorSagun, CG-
dc.contributor.authorShaik, RA-
dc.contributor.authorShankar, NG-
dc.contributor.authorSommer, K-
dc.contributor.authorToro, E-
dc.contributor.authorTran, HTH-
dc.contributor.authorUrgel, EL-
dc.contributor.authorUwiringiyimana, E-
dc.contributor.authorVanichbuncha, T-
dc.contributor.authorYoussef, N-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T00:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-23T00:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Global Health, 2024, v. 14-
dc.identifier.issn2047-2978-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347378-
dc.description.abstract<p> <span>Background Central and bridge nodes can drive significant overall improvements within their respective networks. We aimed to identify them in 16 prevalent chronic diseases during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to guide effective intervention strategies and appropriate resource allocation for most significant holistic lifestyle and health improvements. Methods We surveyed 16512 adults from July 2020 to August 2021 in 30 territories. Participants self-reported their medical histories and the perceived impact of COVID-19 on 18 lifestyle factors and 13 health outcomes. For each disease subgroup, we generated lifestyle, health outcome, and bridge networks. Variables with the highest centrality indices in each were identified central or bridge. We validated these networks using nonparametric and case-dropping subset bootstrapping and confirmed central and bridge variables’ significantly higher indices through a centrality difference test. Findings Among the 48 networks, 44 were validated (all correlation-stability coefficients?>0.25). Six central lifestyle factors were identified: less consumption of snacks (for the chronic disease: anxiety), less sugary drinks (cancer, gastric ulcer, hypertension, insomnia, and pre-diabetes), less smoking tobacco (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), frequency of exercise (depression and fatty liver disease), duration of exercise (irritable bowel syndrome), and overall amount of exercise (autoimmune disease, diabetes, eczema, heart attack, and high cholesterol). Two central health outcomes emerged: less emotional distress (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, eczema, fatty liver disease, gastric ulcer, heart attack, high cholesterol, hypertension, insomnia, and pre-diabetes) and quality of life (anxiety, autoimmune disease, cancer, depression, diabetes, and irritable bowel syndrome). Four bridge lifestyles were identified: consumption of fruits and vegetables (diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and insomnia), less duration of sitting (eczema, fatty liver disease, and heart attack), frequency of exercise (autoimmune disease, depression, and heart attack), and overall amount of exercise (anxiety, gastric ulcer, and insomnia). The centrality difference test showed the central and bridge variables had significantly higher centrality indices than others in their networks (P<0.05). Conclusion To effectively manage chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic, enhanced interventions and optimised resource allocation toward central lifestyle factors, health outcomes, and bridge lifestyles are paramount. The key variables shared across chronic diseases emphasise the importance of coordinated intervention strategies. </span> <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInternational Society of Global Health-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Global Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleKey lifestyles and health outcomes across 16 prevalent chronic diseases: A network analysis of an international observational study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.7189/jogh.14.04068-
dc.identifier.pmid38606605-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85190491148-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.eissn2047-2986-
dc.identifier.issnl2047-2978-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats