File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Silver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle

TitleSilver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle
Authors
KeywordsDental erosion
Enamel
Fluorides
Salivary pellicle
Silver diamine fluoride
Stannous fluoride
Issue Date1-Oct-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 149 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To compare the prevention of enamel erosion and discolouring effect with a single and two weekly topical applications of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution. Methods: Human enamel blocks were divided into four groups. Group 1 (SDF2) received two weekly applications of SDF solution (Advantage Arrest: 260,000 ppm Ag, 44,300 ppm F, pH 9.1). Group 2 (SDF1) received a single application of SDF solution. Group 3 (SNF, Positive Control) received daily application of stannous-chloride/amine-fluoride/sodium-fluoride solution (Elmex® Enamel professional: 800 ppm Sn(II), 500 ppm F, pH 4.5). Group 4 (DW, Negative Control) received daily application of deionised water. The treated blocks were subjected to a 14-day erosive challenge. Crystal characteristics, elemental composition, surface morphology, percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMHL), surface loss, and total colour change (ΔE) of the blocks were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers’ hardness testing, non-contact profilometry, and digital spectrophotometry, respectively. Results: XRD and EDS revealed precipitates of silver for SDF2 and SDF1 and tin for SNF. SEM showed prominent etched enamel pattern on DW than the other three groups. The%SMHL (%) of SDF2, SDF1, SNF, and DW were 26.6 ± 2.9, 33.6 ± 2.8, 38.9 ± 2.9, and 50.5 ± 2.8 (SDF2SDF1=SNF>DW, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Two weekly applications was more effective than a single application of SDF in preventing enamel erosion, though it caused more discolouration. Clinical significance: Topical application of 38 % SDF with two weekly applications protocol is effective in preventing enamel erosion.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350190
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChawhuaveang, Darren Dhananthat-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Walter Yu Hang-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Chun Hung-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ollie Yiru-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-21T03:56:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-21T03:56:45Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 149-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350190-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the prevention of enamel erosion and discolouring effect with a single and two weekly topical applications of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution. Methods: Human enamel blocks were divided into four groups. Group 1 (SDF2) received two weekly applications of SDF solution (Advantage Arrest: 260,000 ppm Ag, 44,300 ppm F, pH 9.1). Group 2 (SDF1) received a single application of SDF solution. Group 3 (SNF, Positive Control) received daily application of stannous-chloride/amine-fluoride/sodium-fluoride solution (Elmex® Enamel professional: 800 ppm Sn(II), 500 ppm F, pH 4.5). Group 4 (DW, Negative Control) received daily application of deionised water. The treated blocks were subjected to a 14-day erosive challenge. Crystal characteristics, elemental composition, surface morphology, percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMHL), surface loss, and total colour change (ΔE) of the blocks were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers’ hardness testing, non-contact profilometry, and digital spectrophotometry, respectively. Results: XRD and EDS revealed precipitates of silver for SDF2 and SDF1 and tin for SNF. SEM showed prominent etched enamel pattern on DW than the other three groups. The%SMHL (%) of SDF2, SDF1, SNF, and DW were 26.6 ± 2.9, 33.6 ± 2.8, 38.9 ± 2.9, and 50.5 ± 2.8 (SDF2SDF1=SNF>DW, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Two weekly applications was more effective than a single application of SDF in preventing enamel erosion, though it caused more discolouration. Clinical significance: Topical application of 38 % SDF with two weekly applications protocol is effective in preventing enamel erosion.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry-
dc.subjectDental erosion-
dc.subjectEnamel-
dc.subjectFluorides-
dc.subjectSalivary pellicle-
dc.subjectSilver diamine fluoride-
dc.subjectStannous fluoride-
dc.titleSilver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105287-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85200557342-
dc.identifier.volume149-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-176X-
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5712-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats