File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105287
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85200557342
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Silver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle
Title | Silver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Dental erosion Enamel Fluorides Salivary pellicle Silver diamine fluoride Stannous fluoride |
Issue Date | 1-Oct-2024 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Journal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 149 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: To compare the prevention of enamel erosion and discolouring effect with a single and two weekly topical applications of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution. Methods: Human enamel blocks were divided into four groups. Group 1 (SDF2) received two weekly applications of SDF solution (Advantage Arrest: 260,000 ppm Ag, 44,300 ppm F, pH 9.1). Group 2 (SDF1) received a single application of SDF solution. Group 3 (SNF, Positive Control) received daily application of stannous-chloride/amine-fluoride/sodium-fluoride solution (Elmex® Enamel professional: 800 ppm Sn(II), 500 ppm F, pH 4.5). Group 4 (DW, Negative Control) received daily application of deionised water. The treated blocks were subjected to a 14-day erosive challenge. Crystal characteristics, elemental composition, surface morphology, percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMHL), surface loss, and total colour change (ΔE) of the blocks were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers’ hardness testing, non-contact profilometry, and digital spectrophotometry, respectively. Results: XRD and EDS revealed precipitates of silver for SDF2 and SDF1 and tin for SNF. SEM showed prominent etched enamel pattern on DW than the other three groups. The%SMHL (%) of SDF2, SDF1, SNF, and DW were 26.6 ± 2.9, 33.6 ± 2.8, 38.9 ± 2.9, and 50.5 ± 2.8 (SDF2SDF1=SNF>DW, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Two weekly applications was more effective than a single application of SDF in preventing enamel erosion, though it caused more discolouration. Clinical significance: Topical application of 38 % SDF with two weekly applications protocol is effective in preventing enamel erosion. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350190 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chawhuaveang, Darren Dhananthat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Walter Yu Hang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, Chun Hung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Ollie Yiru | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-21T03:56:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-21T03:56:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Dentistry, 2024, v. 149 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-5712 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350190 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To compare the prevention of enamel erosion and discolouring effect with a single and two weekly topical applications of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution. Methods: Human enamel blocks were divided into four groups. Group 1 (SDF2) received two weekly applications of SDF solution (Advantage Arrest: 260,000 ppm Ag, 44,300 ppm F, pH 9.1). Group 2 (SDF1) received a single application of SDF solution. Group 3 (SNF, Positive Control) received daily application of stannous-chloride/amine-fluoride/sodium-fluoride solution (Elmex® Enamel professional: 800 ppm Sn(II), 500 ppm F, pH 4.5). Group 4 (DW, Negative Control) received daily application of deionised water. The treated blocks were subjected to a 14-day erosive challenge. Crystal characteristics, elemental composition, surface morphology, percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMHL), surface loss, and total colour change (ΔE) of the blocks were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Vickers’ hardness testing, non-contact profilometry, and digital spectrophotometry, respectively. Results: XRD and EDS revealed precipitates of silver for SDF2 and SDF1 and tin for SNF. SEM showed prominent etched enamel pattern on DW than the other three groups. The%SMHL (%) of SDF2, SDF1, SNF, and DW were 26.6 ± 2.9, 33.6 ± 2.8, 38.9 ± 2.9, and 50.5 ± 2.8 (SDF2SDF1=SNF>DW, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Two weekly applications was more effective than a single application of SDF in preventing enamel erosion, though it caused more discolouration. Clinical significance: Topical application of 38 % SDF with two weekly applications protocol is effective in preventing enamel erosion. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dentistry | - |
dc.subject | Dental erosion | - |
dc.subject | Enamel | - |
dc.subject | Fluorides | - |
dc.subject | Salivary pellicle | - |
dc.subject | Silver diamine fluoride | - |
dc.subject | Stannous fluoride | - |
dc.title | Silver diamine fluoride in preventing enamel erosion: An in vitro study with salivary pellicle | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105287 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85200557342 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 149 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-176X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0300-5712 | - |