File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: High heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing

TitleHigh heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing
Authors
KeywordsArtificial intelligence
Cross-cultural skills
Interdisciplinary knowledge
Metaphor analysis
Writing
Issue Date1-Apr-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Computers & Education, 2025, v. 228 How to Cite?
AbstractThis research employed metaphor analysis to explore 277 postgraduate students' perceptions of the role of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic writing. All participants were international students, from a total of 14 countries and regions, studying in the United Kingdom. Data collection was carried out in two phases. The first was a survey comprising demographic and metaphor-related questions, and the second involved metaphor checking, in which participants provided screenshots of their interactions with GenAI. The data, which were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, yielded 53 unique metaphors for the concept of GenAI in academic writing. We divided these into four conceptual categories in what we term the 4T Pyramid Model: Technical Support (representative metaphor: high-heeled shoes), Text Development (compass), Transformative Potential (Spider-Man), and Threat (drug). The respondents' academic disciplines influenced their perceptions of GenAI, but overall, the results suggest that most viewed it as transformative, i.e., more than just a writing tool. This study's innovative methodology integrating metaphor analysis with real user interactions offers a framework, aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy, that reveals the multi-level benefits and potential risks of GenAI. It also provides actionable insights for AI literacy education, including strategies for effective prompt design.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362823
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.651

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJin, Fangzhou-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Lanfang-
dc.contributor.authorPan, Yunqiu-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chin Hsi-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T00:35:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-01T00:35:30Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationComputers & Education, 2025, v. 228-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1315-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362823-
dc.description.abstractThis research employed metaphor analysis to explore 277 postgraduate students' perceptions of the role of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic writing. All participants were international students, from a total of 14 countries and regions, studying in the United Kingdom. Data collection was carried out in two phases. The first was a survey comprising demographic and metaphor-related questions, and the second involved metaphor checking, in which participants provided screenshots of their interactions with GenAI. The data, which were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, yielded 53 unique metaphors for the concept of GenAI in academic writing. We divided these into four conceptual categories in what we term the 4T Pyramid Model: Technical Support (representative metaphor: high-heeled shoes), Text Development (compass), Transformative Potential (Spider-Man), and Threat (drug). The respondents' academic disciplines influenced their perceptions of GenAI, but overall, the results suggest that most viewed it as transformative, i.e., more than just a writing tool. This study's innovative methodology integrating metaphor analysis with real user interactions offers a framework, aligned with Bloom's Taxonomy, that reveals the multi-level benefits and potential risks of GenAI. It also provides actionable insights for AI literacy education, including strategies for effective prompt design.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofComputers & Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence-
dc.subjectCross-cultural skills-
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary knowledge-
dc.subjectMetaphor analysis-
dc.subjectWriting-
dc.titleHigh heels, compass, spider-man, or drug? Metaphor analysis of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105248-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85215232829-
dc.identifier.volume228-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-782X-
dc.identifier.issnl0360-1315-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats